This guide is based on our blog post Debugging Production Issues with AI Agents: Automating Datadog Error Analysis.
Overview
Running a production service is hard. Errors and bugs crop up due to product updates, infrastructure changes, or unexpected user behavior. When these issues arise, it’s critical to identify and fix them quickly to minimize downtime and maintain user trust—but this is challenging, especially at scale. What if AI agents could handle the initial investigation automatically? This allows engineers to start with a detailed report of the issue, including root cause analysis and specific recommendations for fixes, dramatically speeding up the debugging process. OpenHands accelerates incident response by:- Automated error analysis: AI agents investigate errors and provide detailed reports
- Root cause identification: Connect symptoms to underlying issues in your codebase
- Fix recommendations: Generate specific, actionable recommendations for resolving issues
- Integration with monitoring tools: Work directly with platforms like Datadog
Automated Datadog Error Analysis
The OpenHands Software Agent SDK provides powerful capabilities for building autonomous AI agents that can integrate with monitoring platforms like Datadog. A ready-to-use GitHub Actions workflow demonstrates how to automate error analysis.How It Works
Datadog is a popular monitoring and analytics platform that provides comprehensive error tracking capabilities. It aggregates logs, metrics, and traces from your applications, making it easier to identify and investigate issues in production. Datadog’s Error Tracking groups similar errors together and provides detailed insights into their occurrences, stack traces, and affected services. OpenHands can automatically analyze these errors and provide detailed investigation reports.Triggering Automated Debugging
The GitHub Actions workflow can be triggered in two ways:- Search Query: Provide a search query (e.g., “JSONDecodeError”) to find all recent errors matching that pattern. This is useful for investigating categories of errors.
- Specific Error ID: Provide a specific Datadog error tracking ID to deep-dive into a known issue. You can copy the error ID from DataDog’s error tracking UI using the “Actions” button.
Automated Investigation Process
When the workflow runs, it automatically performs the following steps:- Get detailed info from the DataDog API
- Create or find an existing GitHub issue to track the error
- Clone all relevant repositories to get full code context
- Run an OpenHands agent to analyze the error and investigate the code
- Post the findings as a comment on the GitHub issue
The workflow posts findings to GitHub issues for human review before any code changes are made. If you want the agent to create a fix, you can follow up using the OpenHands GitHub integration and say
@openhands go ahead and create a pull request to fix this issue based on your analysis.Setting Up the Workflow
To set up automated Datadog debugging in your own repository:- Copy the workflow file to
.github/workflows/in your repository - Configure the required secrets (Datadog API keys, LLM API key)
- Customize the default queries and repository lists for your needs
- Run the workflow manually or set up scheduled runs
Manual Incident Investigation
You can also use OpenHands directly to investigate incidents without the automated workflow.Log Analysis
OpenHands can analyze logs to identify patterns and anomalies:| Log Type | Analysis Capabilities |
|---|---|
| Application logs | Error patterns, exception traces, timing anomalies |
| Access logs | Traffic patterns, slow requests, error responses |
| System logs | Resource exhaustion, process crashes, system errors |
| Database logs | Slow queries, deadlocks, connection issues |
Stack Trace Analysis
Deep dive into stack traces:- Java
- Python
- JavaScript
Root Cause Analysis
Identify the underlying cause of an incident:Common Incident Patterns
OpenHands can recognize and help diagnose these common patterns:- Connection pool exhaustion: Increasing connection errors followed by complete failure
- Memory leaks: Gradual memory increase leading to OOM
- Cascading failures: One service failure triggering others
- Thundering herd: Simultaneous requests overwhelming a service
- Split brain: Inconsistent state across distributed components
Quick Fix Generation
Once the root cause is identified, generate fixes:Best Practices
Investigation Checklist
Use this checklist when investigating:-
Scope the impact
- How many users affected?
- What functionality is broken?
- What’s the business impact?
-
Establish timeline
- When did it start?
- What changed around that time?
- Is it getting worse or stable?
-
Gather data
- Application logs
- Infrastructure metrics
- Recent deployments
- Configuration changes
-
Form hypotheses
- List possible causes
- Rank by likelihood
- Test systematically
-
Implement fix
- Choose safest fix
- Test before deploying
- Monitor after deployment
Common Pitfalls
For production incidents, always follow your organization’s incident response procedures. OpenHands is a tool to assist your investigation, not a replacement for proper incident management.
Related Resources
- OpenHands SDK Repository - Build custom AI agents
- Datadog Debugging Workflow - Ready-to-use GitHub Actions workflow
- Prompting Best Practices - Write effective prompts

